Supreme Court Voting Rules

[Janet Alexander]

It would compromise intelligence methods and sources, of course.

At 06:27 PM 9/26/2006 -0400, Douglas Laycock wrote:

>An academic friend of mine inquired about the Rule of Six from a friend of 
>his who works in the Supreme Court Clerk's office.  I am being vague about 
>identities because I don't want to risk getting anyone in trouble.  My 
>friend got the following answer from his friend:
>
>"I wish I could help.  The internal voting rules have now been reduced to 
>writing, but the document is considered confidential."
>
>I am having trouble imagining what could be in this document that can't be 
>revealed to lawyers practicing before the Court.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
>http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
>private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
>posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or 
>wrongly) forward the messages to others.

Janet Cooper Alexander
Frederick I. Richman Professor of Law
Stanford Law School
Stanford CA 94301-8610
650.723.2892
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20060926/40a058ac/attachment.htm