Jewish Champions of First Amendment (when is free speech
viable?)
MatthewHPolSci at aol.com
MatthewHPolSci at aol.com
Mon Sep 11 13:18:20 PDT 2006
I appreciate Professor Schweber's post. Leaving aside the former
discussion of the Communists (which we could examine in some other forum) the post
contains the following statement: “. . . this, of course, is the question of
whether it mattered whether support for free speech was tactical. But most
people who argue in favor of free speech, freedom of religion, or anything else
do so in their own case.”
This quoted portion is fundamental for this forum of law professors,
political scientists, and others. Perhaps someone feels ready, willing, and
able to deal with the following question.
Assume a written constitution provides the right of free speech. What
current writers in law or political science (including those on this list)
offer a contemporary empirical theory as to the conditions under which free
speech will be viable in a political system and the conditions under which it
will not be viable? (I continue to find merit in Merriam, The Written
Constitution and the Unwritten Attitude (circa 1930), but I appear to be isolated
in that regard.)
Concretely, who has offered a theory to show what persons or groups will be
allowed, in fact, to exercise the right of free speech, and under what
conditions? If this has been disposed of already to the satisfaction of most
colleagues, I will be just as happy to receive responses offline. If, on the
other hand, there is some new work within the past five to ten years, or some
work in progress, I should especially like to know.
Matthew Holden, Jr.
Henry L. and Grace M. Doherty Professor Emeritus of Politics,
University of Virginia
***
Address:
160 Rollingwood Drive
Jackson, MS 39211 USA
Phone: 601-952-0596
mh3q at virginia.edu,
matthewhpolsci at aol.com,
matthewholden at bellsouth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20060911/ce8b810e/attachment.htm
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list