moment of truth

DavidEBernstein at DavidEBernstein at
Thu Sep 7 08:57:08 PDT 2006

I'm not sure where this blanket statement comes from.  The Supreme Court 
certainly believes this, but I don't see anything in the Constitution that states 
or even suggests that the final interpretation of the meaning of an 
international treaty is in the hands of the Supreme Court. 

In a message dated 9/7/2006 11:52:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
markstein at writes:
Under our system, neither the President nor Congress can say to the Supreme 
Court: your 
interpretation of the Geneva Conventions is wrong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the Conlawprof mailing list