Repeal of race preference programs: Effects onAsiansandpublicreactions

[Volokh, Eugene]

    Is something rotten when Jews are 2% of the population but 26% of
the law professors?


________________________________

	From: conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Jamar
	Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:22 PM
	Cc: CONLAWPROF at lists.ucla.edu
	Subject: Re: Repeal of race preference programs: Effects
onAsiansandpublicreactions
	
	

	On Nov 28, 2006, at 1:15 AM, Rick Duncan wrote:


		But when a black child of two MDs is admitted and given
a full scholarship over a white child from a non-privileged home,
because the former is a member of a disadvantaged minority group,
something is rotten in the state of Allen.
		


	And something is rotten when blacks are 11% of the population
but only 4% of the lawyers.

	-- 

	Prof. Steven D. Jamar                               vox:
202-806-8017
	Howard University School of Law                     fax:
202-806-8567
	2900 Van Ness Street NW
mailto:stevenjamar at gmail.com
	Washington, DC  20008
http://iipsj.com/SDJ/
	
	

	

	
	

	"A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is the
skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content
according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used." 

	
	

	Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Towne v. Eisner, 245 U.S. 418,
425 (1918)

	
	



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20061127/4712302b/attachment.htm