What About the No Test Oath Clause

Steven Jamar stevenjamar at gmail.com
Fri Nov 24 16:54:08 PST 2006


On Nov 24, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Bob Sheridan wrote:

>
>
> Steven Jamar wrote:
>
> "...Fourth, to the private workplace the US Constitution does not  
> reach.  So one would need to look to the duty to accommodate  
> religious practices and beliefs under state anti-discrimination laws."
>
> ***
>
> The Constitution may or may not reach the private workplace per se,

Under what circumstances may the Constitution reach the private  
workplace per se, other than the 13th Amendment banning slavery?

> but if a large business, such as Macy's, for example, fires a  
> worker for showing up with a Muslim head-scarf, doesn't she have an  
> issue to bring to the U.S. EEOC as a matter of religious  
> discrimination in employment?

Statutory claim.  Not constitutional claim, no?

>
> Bob S.
>

-- 
Prof. Steven D. Jamar                     vox:  202-806-8017
Howard University School of Law           fax:  202-806-8567
2900 Van Ness Street NW         mailto:stevenjamar at gmail.com
Washington, DC  20008	               http://iipsj.com/SDJ/

"Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking.  
There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked  
solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think."

- Martin Luther King Jr., "Strength to Love", 1963



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20061124/d76e41be/attachment.html


More information about the Conlawprof mailing list