New ConLaw Casebook--Is This Appropriate? Erratum

[DavidEBernstein at aol.com]

That should have been "be prohibited from from refusing to rent"

In a message dated 3/1/2006 3:55:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
DavidEBernstein at aol.com writes:
"May a religious landlord, who believes that the teachings of his religion 
prohibit him from aiding and abetting fornication, including by homosexuals, be 
prohibiting from renting to a homosexual couple? Would it make a difference if 
the potential renter was an individual gay man or woman?  Would it make a 
difference if the refusal to rent under either circumstance was not advocated by 
the leaders of the landlord's religious group, but was the landlord's own 
interpretation of his religious obligations?"

David E. Bernstein
Visiting Professor
University of Michigan School of Law
Professor
George Mason University School of Law
http://mason.gmu.edu/~dbernste
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20060301/0cd4e1cc/attachment.html