legal epistemolog (was attitudinalism in medicine)

[Sean Wilson]

I would just say this: there are not two approaches, one right answer and no answers. There are three basic approaches: (1) one right answer (determinism); (2) no right answer (skepticism); and (3) "wrong answers" which narrow the choice of the best alternative (structuralism). I have written about this in great detail if anyone is interested.
   
  http://ludwig.squarespace.com/law-and-politics/2006/6/3/the-philosophic-story-of-legal-justification.html
   
  By the way, if people think my last post was too aggressive, I apologize. You know what? I'm going to just bow out of this subject now. I'm too busy today anyway. My views are very clearly specified above if anyone is interested.
   
  Regards.
   


Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq. 
Penn State University 
http://ludwig.squarespace.com/home/
 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/pipermail/conlawprof/attachments/20060608/3120f4b4/attachment.htm