Dershowitz on Rehnquist

Earl Maltz emaltz at camden.rutgers.edu
Sat Sep 10 11:14:50 PDT 2005


I nominate an oldy but goody, his dissent in Arnett v. Kennedy.

At 12:17 PM 9/10/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I am curious about one sentence in the now notorious obituary:  "Yet no
>opinion comes to mind which will be
>remembered as brilliant, innovative, or memorable."  This is obviously
>wrong with regard to "innovative" or "memorable."  Surely the opinion in
>National League of Cities is "innovative" by any reasonable criteria,
>and, for better and for worse, some of Rehnquist's opinions are surely
>"memorable," such as his disgraceful comment in Garrett about
>discrimination against the handicapped being thoroughly "rational" and
>therefore untouchable by Congress under Section 5.  But what opinion
>would any of his admirers on this list offer as an example of
>"brilliance"?  Perhaps, like Dan Farber, you think that "billiance" is
>overrated.  But if you don't, then I'd be genuinely interested in which
>of his opinions are supposed to manifest that quality.  One candidate, I
>suppose, is his dissent in Grutter, which does indeed demolish much of
>O'Connor's argument with regard to "critical mass" and the like. One
>problem, though, presumably for any of the justices, is whether it is
>Rehnquist who gets the A+ or, rather, his clerk.
>
>Indeed, to be frank, I'm not sure I can think of any opinions offhand in
>recent years, by any of the justices, that strike me as "brilliant."  So
>I suppose that those of us who are skeptical of Rehnquist's "billiance"
>might address whether anyone else on the Court does any better.
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
>http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
>private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
>posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or 
>wrongly) forward the messages to others.



More information about the Conlawprof mailing list