Dershowitz on Rehnquist

[JMHACLJ at aol.com]

In a message dated 9/9/2005 1:14:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
bobsheridan at earthlink.net writes:

When the  substance of a complaint is evaded in favor of a 
counter-complaint about  the timing or the form, it is reminiscent of the 
husband who complains to  his wife that she has AGAIN left her shoes on 
the stairs, only to be met  with, "Don't give me that tone of voice!" and 
"You did the same thing last  Christmas, don't you remember?"

It is doubtful that Dershowitz has said  anything that hadn't been said 
_/inter vivos/_ the life of the Chief, or  that he wasn't legally 
warranted in saying had he said it then.  It  seems eminently relevant 
and fitting to state ones opinion _/post  mortem/_, when the subject of 
the life is under active discussion.   The truth may be many-sided, and 
supportors, family, and friends do not  have a monopoly on the discussion.


 
I'm curious about something.  What evidence supports the claim of  
goosestepping?  Of Heil Hitlering?  These things are either true on  false, they are not 
capable of being both true and false.  
 
Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20050909/f46eaf5c/attachment.htm