Cold-button Cases?

Paul Finkelman paul-finkelman at utulsa.edu
Sun Oct 30 07:46:32 PST 2005


Clarence Thomas I believe argued that Griswold was wrong and implied 
that Brown and Loving were wrongly decided.  I always regretted that no 
one in the Senate had the guts to ask him point black if he thought, 
given his jurisprudence, that Loving was correctly decided.

 
Paul Finkelman
Chapman Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Tulsa College of Law
3120 East 4th Place
Tulsa, OK   74104-3189

918-631-3706 (office)
918-631-2194 (fax)

paul-finkelman at utulsa.edu




Roger Goldman wrote:

>Is there a consensus on this list that the following cases were correcty
>decided, in result, if not reasoning:  Moore, Eisenstadt, Griswold,
>Skinner, Pierce and Meyer?
>
>Would the Senate confirm a nominee who stated that those cases a. were
>wrongly decided or b. should survive only because of stare decisis?
>
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>  
>

--





More information about the Conlawprof mailing list