Cold-button Cases?

[Matthew J. Franck]

If "consensus" means what it ordinarily means--that everyone agrees or at 
least "goes along" without vigorous dissent--then I dissent.  Every case 
listed below was wrongly decided.  And here I thought everyone thought so . . .

Matt
***************************
Matthew J. Franck
Professor and Chairman
Department of Political Science
Radford University
P.O. Box 6945
Radford, VA 24142-6945
phone 540-831-5854
fax 540-831-6075
e-mail <mailto:mfranck at radford.edu>mfranck at radford.edu
www.radford.edu/~mfranck
***************************
At 09:02 AM 10/30/2005, Roger Goldman wrote:

>Is there a consensus on this list that the following cases were correcty
>decided, in result, if not reasoning:  Moore, Eisenstadt, Griswold,
>Skinner, Pierce and Meyer?
>
>Would the Senate confirm a nominee who stated that those cases a. were
>wrongly decided or b. should survive only because of stare decisis?
>
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
>http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
>Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
>private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are 
>posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or 
>wrongly) forward the messages to others.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20051030/12d58173/attachment.html