Conservative Court?
RJLipkin at aol.com
RJLipkin at aol.com
Wed Nov 2 16:18:00 PST 2005
Much of this response is tendentious and idiosyncratic at least from my
perspective. Let me make some brief points: (1) Wittgenstein would never
characterize "liberal" and "conservative" as having simply one ordinary meaning and
one technical meaning. (2) Empirical investigation of political philosophical
terms either has content tied to ordinary language or it does not. I don't
recognize the meanings of the terms "conservative" or "liberal" in Sean's post.
Were we to engage in Wittgensteinian analysis, it would generate, I'm sure,
several interesting senses of both terms or ways to use them. So when
empirical research assesses judges in these terms, which sense is being
investigated? (3) Ignoring concepts with political philosophical content and restricting
them instead to some narrow empirical construct distorts ordinary language as
well as places an enormous obstacle in the hopeful enterprise of revising
ordinary language. (4) Comparing justices, regarding their conservatism or
liberalism, is woefully incomplete, in my view, without appealing to political
philosophical concepts and arguments. (5) To say "So the point is this: you
seem to want to know to what extent ABSTRACT IDEAS (libertarianism,
egalitarianism) affect judicial choice. The variable coding in the supreme court data
base really isn't concerned with that." simply begs the question of the use of
abstract content in empirical inquiry or ignores other possible perspectives
on the relationship between abstract conceptual content and empirical
inquiry. And, if that's so, from my perspective, so much the worse for the supreme
court data base.
I suspect we're talking past each other. Our purposes are probably
radically different. In that regard it might have been more helpful had you
simply answered my questions succinctly and directly. But I suspect the breach
might be too broad between us.
Bobby
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20051102/3b00a385/attachment.htm
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list