Loyalty Oaths and such things
Volokh, Eugene
VOLOKH at law.ucla.edu
Tue Feb 8 10:28:29 PST 2005
I would think that while private universities have First
Amendment rights vis-a-vis the state and federal government, and while
state universities might have First Amendment rights vis-a-vis the
federal government, state universities would not have First Amendment
rights vis-a-vis the state government that created them and has the
power to run them. (I'm pretty sure that there's a Supreme Court case
holding that cities lack constitutional rights vis-a-vis states, but I
forget the name.)
I can imagine contrary arguments, and I can imagine state
constitutional arguments in whatever states might have state
constitutional guarantees of independence for the university. But that
seems the likeliest, and most likely correct, result.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
> [mailto:conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Randy Bezanson
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:43 AM
> To: conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
> Subject: Loyalty Oaths and such things
>
>
>
> I'm late to this exchange, but let me ask whether anyone has
> thought about
> how the recent Solomon Amendment case might fit in here. The
> Circuit Court
> decided, as I recall, that in discriminating against military
> recruiters at
> the law schools those law schools were exercising their free
> speech rights
> to express a collective view on the question of excluding
> gays and lesbians
> from the services (don't ask, don't tell), their expression
> taking the form
> of collective action. This might mean that an educational
> institution
> might be able to "speak" a collective view (diversity, e.g.)
> through tests
> of belief or conduct applied to outsiders, students, or maybe faculty.
>
> I'm not arguing for or against the point, but just observing
> an implication
> of the Boy Scouts (and other) case, and wondering whether it
> complicates
> analysis of the oath problem in Ohio and in the hypothetical settings
> people have mentioned.
>
> Randy Bezanson
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password,
> see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
> viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read
> messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives;
> and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
> messages to others.
>
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list