Impeachment and "good behavior"

[Mark Tushnet]

I know that there was a thread on this question earlier, but I have a 
tweak I'm interested in.  The proposed Constitution Restoration Act 
provides (roughly) that reliance on non-U.S. law in constitutional 
interpretation "shall be deemed to constitute the commission of (1) an 
offense for which the judge may be removed upon impeachment and 
conviction; and (2) a breach of the standard of good behavior required 
by article III, section 1 of the Constitution."  My question is:  What's 
the difference between Clause 1 and Clause 2 of this proposal?

Also, I recall noting a draft posted on SSRN of a paper arguing that 
"good behavior" wasn't the same as [the negative of] "high crimes and 
misdemeanors," but I can't locate the reference.  I'd appreciate any 
guidance to it.  Thanks in advance.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20051226/3edb3cc6/attachment.html