[Fwd: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Professor Yoo]

JMHACLJ at aol.com JMHACLJ at aol.com
Sat Dec 17 15:03:19 PST 2005


Although it may not be dispositive of the questions, can someone shed light  
on how the requirements for warrants were strictly adhered to, slightly 
adhered  to, or avoided when convenient, when national interests, as estimated by 
the  Crown and the government in England thought it so required.  In other  
words, what precise historic practices relating to warrant prerequisites were  
imported into our Constitution by adoption of the existing practices.   

Jim Henderson
Senior Counsel
ACLJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20051217/7e6209d4/attachment.htm


More information about the Conlawprof mailing list