The End of the Electoral College?
Paul Mulshine
pmulshine at starledger.com
Fri Oct 15 08:47:59 PDT 2004
MessageAs a mere journalist, a columnist at the Star-Ledger of New Jersey who wrote what is I believe the first news account of that Colorado initiative and its potential impact, may I ask a simple question: Is this entire debate not irrelevant? I can see no possible scenario under which the small states would approve and amendment that would take away the disproportionate power they have under the current system. Can anyone see such a scenario?
Paul Mulshine
The Star-Ledger
----- Original Message -----
From: Conkle, Daniel O.
To: conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: The End of the Electoral College?
On the other hand, imagine the 2000 election without the electoral college, or imagine--it's not too hard to do!--a virtually 50-50 split in the 2004 popular vote. The electoral college at least focused the post-2000 recounts and litigation in a single state. Without the electoral college, would we not be inviting recounts and lawsuits nationwide, in an attempt by partisans on both sides to pick up votes wherever they could, even in relatively small numbers? Or am I mistaken? Is the popular vote outcome more likely to be definitive even in a close election?
Dan Conkle
**************************************
Daniel O. Conkle
Professor of Law
Indiana University School of Law
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
(812) 855-4331
fax (812) 855-0555
e-mail conkle at indiana.edu
**************************************
P.S. Apologies if this is a duplicate posting. I think I made an error in sending it a little while ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu [mailto:conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Zimmer
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:42 AM
To: RJLipkin at aol.com
Cc: CONLAWPROF at lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: The End of the Electoral College?
Yes, the Electoral College system should be changed and the effort should not be partisan. We have moved toward broader democracy and it is long past time to give the American people the right to vote for President. We would be much further along on doing this if the Supreme Court had not cut off the way the Constitution envisioned the selection of the President to work. Assuming the Florida courts decided that Gore won, so Gore's electors were sent to Washington and assume that the Florida legislature had voted to sent Bush's electors, everyone would concretely have realized that we do not have the right to vote for the President, even though we do in all the states. I think the Electoral College system would not survive the dawning of that reality.
Michael J. Zimmer
Professor of Law
Seton Hall Law School
One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102
973.642.8833
973.642.8194 fax
-----conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu wrote: -----
To: CONLAWPROF at lists.ucla.edu
From: RJLipkin at aol.com
Sent by: conlawprof-bounces at lists.ucla.edu
Date: 10/15/2004 09:00AM
Subject: The End of the Electoral College?
Would (should) there be a partisan attempt to eliminate the Electoral College were Senator Kerry to win the presidency, but lose the popular vote? Would it be successful?
Bobby
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20041015/a7f18e38/attachment.htm
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list