The relevance of a doctrine's being

RJLipkin at aol.com RJLipkin at aol.com
Mon Mar 22 16:04:09 PST 2004


In a message dated 3/22/2004 2:54:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
SLevinson at mail.law.utexas.edu writes:
I think that one of the dirty secrets of American history is that "we" were 
probably better off with Lincoln's assassination and the replacement by the 
extraordinarily inept Andrew Johnson than would have been the case if the savior 
of the Union had lived to establish dominance over the aftermath.
        I straightforwardly--that is, without some position on this 
matter--don't understand why, and would appreciate if Sandy or anyone else would 
explain this.

Bobby

Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20040322/82c9220c/attachment.htm


More information about the Conlawprof mailing list