The relevance of a doctrine's being
RJLipkin at aol.com
RJLipkin at aol.com
Mon Mar 22 16:04:09 PST 2004
In a message dated 3/22/2004 2:54:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
SLevinson at mail.law.utexas.edu writes:
I think that one of the dirty secrets of American history is that "we" were
probably better off with Lincoln's assassination and the replacement by the
extraordinarily inept Andrew Johnson than would have been the case if the savior
of the Union had lived to establish dominance over the aftermath.
I straightforwardly--that is, without some position on this
matter--don't understand why, and would appreciate if Sandy or anyone else would
explain this.
Bobby
Robert Justin Lipkin
Professor of Law
Widener University School of Law
Delaware
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20040322/82c9220c/attachment.htm
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list