Public University Requires Extra Security for Pro-IsraelSpeakers

[Ryan Danks]

> I forgot to mention a couple of things in my original post.
> (1)  There's a recent Seventh Circuit opinion -- no, not the
> Skokie litigation -- taking what strikes me as quite a hard
> line on the matter.  After expressing some skepticism
> about whether the procedures for determining cost-
> justified excess costs could ever be accurate enough, it
> accepts for purposes of decision that they were accurate
> in the case, and then holds that the government can't
> charge cost-justified fees for excess security costs.

I believe the case Mark Tushnet referred to is here:
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/op3.fwx?submit1=showop&caseno=02-3541.PDF
Church of the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. City of Gary, IN.