Federalism and Marriage

[Trevor Morrison]

I note that Goodridge would not violate this amendment.


At 11:07 AM 2/24/2004 -0800, Rick Duncan wrote:
>Would those of you who are asserting the principle of
>federalism against the FMA support a Federalism
>Amendment to the Constitution that would state that
>"all issues concerning marriage or family or human
>sexuality or public morality should be decided by the
>states and not by courts interpreting the US
>Constitution"?
>
>Can we all get behind such an amendment?
>
>=====
>Rick Duncan
>Welpton Professor of Law
>University of Nebraska College of Law
>Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
>
>"When the Round Table is broken every man must follow Galahad or Mordred; 
>middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis
>
>"I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or 
>numbered."  --The Prisoner
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
>http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>_______________________________________________
>To post, send message to Conlawprof at lists.ucla.edu
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
>http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/conlawprof

Trevor W. Morrison
Assistant Professor of Law
Cornell Law School
116 Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
607-255-9023