New Jersey election law?

[Mark Tushnet]

Nelson Lund wrote:  "It's equally true that a majority of the Supreme Court
declined to reject this argument."  Sure, but the list of arguments that a
majority of the Supreme Court has declined to reject is essentially infinite
(for example, a majority of the Supreme Court has declined to reject every
argument presented in every unsuccessful petition for certiorari -- not to
mention my favorite legal argument, that the views of Mark Tushnet on every
constitutional question are the law of the land under Article VI, an argument
that a majority of the Supreme Court has also declined to reject).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tushnet.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 242 bytes
Desc: Card for Mark Tushnet
Url : http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20021003/9a73f993/tushnet.vcf