Child Internet Protection Act case

[Mark Tushnet]

In response to Brad Jacob:  In light of Rosenberger, it seems to me that
all the work in his analysis is done by this -- "internet filtering to
eliminate offensive or adult materials does not implicate any
constitutional concerns."  I wonder if he could spell out the reasons
for this conclusion.  That is, it seems to me, at least initially, that
"eliminating offensive or adult materials" is the kind of content-based
decision that Rosenberger says governments can't make when they allocate
(even limited) funds.  What's the argument the other way?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tushnet.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 242 bytes
Desc: Card for Mark Tushnet
Url : http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/private/conlawprof/attachments/20021112/489a30cd/tushnet.vcf