Robert Bork on Bush v. Gore
Richard D. Friedman
rdfrdman at UMICH.EDU
Wed Apr 11 12:13:42 PDT 2001
At 11:48 AM 4/11/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Prof. Friedman: I'd love to see your essay. Also, where can I find the
>Thanks -- Marty Lederman
>From: Richard D. Friedman [mailto:rdfrdman at UMICH.EDU]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 10:01 AM
>To: CONLAWPROF at listserv.ucla.edu@inetgw
>Subject: Re: Robert Bork on Bush v. Gore
>And it's available at
>http//www.newcriterion.com/archive/19/mar01/bork.htm. He, like Posner, is
>very negative about the 14th amendment holding but positive about the
>Article II holding. Charles Fried has also written, in the NY Review, that
>the Article II holding was more persuasive. While I'm at it, I'll give
>myself a plug -- I've written an essay that in form is a response to
>Posner's forthcoming article, though it ranges beyond. I'll be happy to
>send it to any list members who are interested.
>At 07:47 AM 4/11/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >He wrote an artice on it in theNew Criterion about a month ago.
> >Robert Lipkin wrote:
> >>I have been told that Robert Bork has applauded the decision in Bush v.
> >>If so, does anyone have the particulars and/or the cite. I'd be happy to
> >>receive the relevant information off-line. Thank you.
> >>Bobby Lipkin
> >>Widener University School of Law
> >>RJLWLAW at aol.com
More information about the Conlawprof