Restaurant Required to Hire Women Actors/Servers -Reply

[Scarberry, Mark]

 I think Emily's point is that the women are allowed to play men. Of course,
that means the restaurant is required to allow them to do so.

Mark S. Scarberry
Pepperdine

-----Original Message-----
From: Volokh, Eugene
To: CONLAWPROF at listserv.ucla.edu
Sent: 3/30/00 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Restaurant Required to Hire Women Actors/Servers -Reply

     Maybe I'm missing something, but I'd thought that the case
concluded that the restaurant was *required* to let women play men, not
just that it was *allowed* to let women play men.

-----Original Message-----
From: Emily Hartigan
To: CONLAWPROF at listserv.ucla.edu
Sent: 3/30/00 3:30 PM
Subject: Restaurant Required to Hire Women Actors/Servers -Reply

Seems a very historical move to allow women to play men.
SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE reminds us that our great canonical works
were premised on men playing women, so women playing men would
simply be a brilliant historical reference.
Emily Hartigan

>>> "DAVID E. BERNSTEIN" <DBERNSTE at WPGATE.GMU.EDU> 03/28/00
01:20pm >>>
Any comments on the constitutional implications?

Restaurants' male-server policy loses in court
By Stacey Hartmann / Staff Writer
A federal jury has found Cock of the Walk restaurants discriminated
against
women by a past practice of hiring only men as servers to portray
historical
figures who were the toughest fighters on riverboats.
For the full story, see
http://www.tennessean.com/sii/00/03/16/cockwalk16.shtml\
<http://www.tennessean.com/sii/00/03/16/cockwalk16.shtml\>


David E. Bernstein
Associate Professor
George Mason University
School of Law
3401 N. Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
(703) 993-8089
dbernste at wpgate.gmu.edu
< http://members.aol.com/deliotb/home.html
<http://members.aol.com/deliotb/home.html> >