(from Earl Maltz) Relying on concurring opinion as definitive interpretation of majority opinion in the same S. Ct. case

Eugene Volokh volokh at MAIL.LAW.UCLA.EDU
Thu Oct 28 20:03:05 PDT 1999


-----Original Message-----
From:   earl maltz [SMTP:emaltz at crab.rutgers.edu]
Sent:   ä 28 àå÷èåáø 1999 12:23

Does anyone know of a case or cases in which a lower court relied on a
concurring opinion as a definitive interpetation of a majority opinion in
the same S. Ct. case?

Earl



More information about the Conlawprof mailing list