(from Earl Maltz) Relying on concurring opinion as definitive
interpretation of majority opinion in the same S. Ct. case
Eugene Volokh
volokh at MAIL.LAW.UCLA.EDU
Thu Oct 28 20:03:05 PDT 1999
-----Original Message-----
From: earl maltz [SMTP:emaltz at crab.rutgers.edu]
Sent: ä 28 àå÷èåáø 1999 12:23
Does anyone know of a case or cases in which a lower court relied on a
concurring opinion as a definitive interpetation of a majority opinion in
the same S. Ct. case?
Earl
More information about the Conlawprof
mailing list